By interacting with the Marginal Archive, you commit to a practice where Rigor is a form of responsibility, and
Openness is a form of resistance.
1. Knowledge as Infrastructure
The Marginal digital environment is not a promotional portfolio; it is a functional research infrastructure.
All
content
hosted here represents Research Nodes - ever-evolving intellectual assets. By accessing the Marginal
Archive,
you agree
to treat these outputs as raw materials for further inquiry, critique, and care-driven initiatives.
2. The Disobedient License
We operate on a principle of radical openness - we refuse intellectual gatekeeping. All methodologies,
datasets,
field
notes, and theoretical frameworks shared here are open-source. This is a deliberate act of resistance
against
the
commodification of knowledge. You are welcomed to adapt, and build upon this knowledge, provided your use
avoids
turning
these research assets back into empty spectacle or purely commercial ventures.
3. Ethics of Care
The use of knowledge from Marginal’s projects carries a commitment to the networks - natural, technological,
and
human -
that made it possible. Users must adhere to the following protocols:
Techno-Nature Ecology: We advocate for a low-impact digital metabolism. If you are deploying our tools or
research
digitally, we encourage the use of energy-efficient practices to minimize the carbon footprint of
information
exchange.
More-Than-Human Care: Any research involving biological entities must be treated with non-anthropocentric
respect - the
subject of the research is a collaborator, not a resource.
Social Care: Our knowledge is built through a loop of alumni and collaborators. Users must respect the
social
ecology of
these networks, ensuring that knowledge remains accessible to the periphery and does not become siloed
within
traditional hierarchies.
4. Rigorous Accountability
Crediting: Every Research Node includes specific metadata. Any use of this data must be accompanied by a
full
citation.
Use the "Cite This" function to ensure the correct contributors are recognized.
Documenting tensions: We believe that properly documented failure is a vital research output, with
tremendous
innovative
potential. If your work builds upon a friction or a failed experiment found here, you are required to
acknowledge that
context.
